©1994-2009 All Rights Reserved. Online Journal of Veterinary Research. You may not store these pages in any form except for your own personal use. All other usage or distribution is illegal under international copyright treaties. Permission to use any of these pages in any other way besides the before mentioned must be gained in writing from the publisher. This article is exclusively copyrighted in its entirety to OJVR publications. This article may be copied once but may not be, reproduced or re-transmitted without the express permission of the editors.

OJVRTM

Online Journal of Veterinary Research©

Volume 7: 78-90, 2003.

Innate Immunoprofiling of Commercial Broiler Chicken Lines

Crippen TL^1*, Pevzner IY^†, Lowry VK^‡,Farnell MB^§, Kogut MH*

*Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, College Station, TX 77845; ^†Cobb-Vantress, Inc, Route 1 Box 1572, Pineville, MO 64856; ^‡Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Public Health and ^§Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 778843. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dr. Tawni Crippen Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center US Department of Agriculture 2881 F & B Rd, College Station, TX 77845

ABSTRACT

Crippen TL, Pevzner IY, Lowry VK,Farnell MB, Kogut MH, Innate Immunoprofiling of Commercial Broiler Chicken Line, Online J Vet Res 7: 78-90, 2003. The innate immune system is a critical component directing the overall response of the immune system early in the inflammatory process. Evaluation of the innate immune system could offer a screening method for the selection of breeding stock from commercial chicken operations to improve flock health and prevent the loss of genes crucial to disease resistance. Three commercial broiler chicken lines (designated Lines A, B and C) were profiled for efficiency of their innate immunologic response. Oxidative burst and bactericidal functions of heterophils and monocytes, as well as heterophil degranulation, were analyzed. The birds were tested 1, 4, 8 and 15 days post-hatch. Individual lines differed in their ability to perform innate immunological responses during the first 15 days post-hatch. Although bactericidal capabilities were similar, oxidative burst responses by monocytes were low in comparison to that generated by heterophils. The fact that monocytes are not particularly adept at producing an oxidative burst at this age suggests that this is not a major avenue of innate defense by monocytes. Heterophil oxidative burst response was stronger in Line C than Line A during the first four days post-hatch. Line B showed no difference from Line C in heterophil oxidative burst response at 1 d, but produced a stronger response than Line C on 4 and 8 d post-hatch. Degranulation by heterophils showed significant differences in responses of Lines A and C depending on the day post-hatch, and stronger response in Line C vs Line B in the first four days post hatch. The first week post-hatch is an important time as chicks are particularly susceptible to infection as neonates. Mortality data of the commercial lines indicates that Line A is the most susceptible to demise, followed by Line C and then Line B. These results suggest that oxidative burst production efficiency is an important defensive function to monitor for immunoprofiling.

KEYWORDS: innate, immunoprofiling, immunocompetence, chicken, selective breeding

BACK TO MAIN PAGE

FULL-TEXT (SUBSCRIPTION)